Legal Opinion

Lifshutz v. Adams

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1941PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.

The action is a stockholder’s derivative action, brought on behalf of Community Water Service Company against eighteen of the corporation’s past and present directors for an accounting and for damages. The amended complaint sets forth two causes of action, one in fraud; the other in negligence, against all the individual defendants. Eight of the individual defendants have challenged, by a motion for judgment on the pleadings, the sufficiency of the facts stated as constituting a first cause of action against them.

The facts said to constitute a first cause of action may be summarized as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Ebbert v. Plymouth Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Corash v. Texas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Truncale v. Universal Pictures Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  5. Manno v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API