Legal Opinion
Manno v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1959PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
The defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint for legal insufficiency, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
In the nine causes of action set forth in the amended complaint, the plaintiff seeks to rescind, on the ground of alleged duress, settlement agreements which he entered into with the defendants and to set aside a surrender of three policies of accident and health insurance and to reinstate them. Provision was made in the policies for the waiver of premium benefits during total and permanent disability and plaintiff claims that the defendants did…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Adrico Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Capps v. Georgia Pacific CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Eulrich v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Steward v. World-Wide Automobiles Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Vassel v. VasselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Reliable Furniture Company v. FIDELITY & GUARANTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.