Corash v. Texas Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
In this stockholder’s action brought on behalf of Indian Refining Company (hereinafter “Indian”), cross-appeals| *294have been taken from an order entered on a motion of certain defendants for summary judgment dismissing the. third cause of action on the ground that it is barred by the Statute of Limitations.
Plaintiff is a stockholder of Indian. Defendants are Indian, The Texas Corporation (hereinafter “ Texas ”) owning ninety-one per cent of Indian’s stock, The Texas Company and Texaco Development Corporation, subsidiaries of Texas, and thirty-two individuals claimed to be present or former…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Potter v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Mack v. MendelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Jno. Dunlop's Sons, Inc. v. SpurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gottfried v. GottfriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Klock v. Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Whitney Holdings, Ltd. v. GivotovskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Coane v. American Distilling Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- European American Bank v. CainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.