Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S. A. L.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on defendant’s motion to quash service of summons and to dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction over the person of Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L. (“Bache Lebanon”). Because plaintiffs have alleged sufficient contacts on the part of Bache Lebanon with Illinois, we deny the motion to dismiss.
The allegations of plaintiffs’ complaint are sufficient to establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction over Bache Lebanon. Plaintiffs allege that Bache Lebanon solicited and accepted commodities orders on the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Metz ApparatewerkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Meyers v. Asics Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1989
- McClenon v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.