Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Asics Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 24, 1989No. CV89-0331-HLH (Kx)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OR QUASH SERVICE; ORDER RE MDL REVIEW (MDL 777)
HUPP, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
This patent infringement action was filed by Stuart Meyers against ASICS Corp. (AS- ICS), a Japanese manufacturer of sports shoes, on December 9, 1989. It came to this court as a low number transfer due to its relation to the case of Meyers v. ASICS Tiger Corp. (Tiger) CV 88-3071. In that case, the plaintiff sued the American subsidiary of ASICS, alleging that the ASICS shoes which Tiger distributes in this country infringe the Meyers patent for a special sole and insole. Tiger is an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Mitchell B. Haisten, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Jean E. Haisten v. Grass Valley Medical Reimbursement Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Laura Ann Vermeulen v. Renault, U.S.A., Inc., Regie Nationale Des Usines RenaultCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Gallagher v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Honda Motor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.