Legal Opinion
Farrington v. Law Firm of Sessions
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 25, 1997No. 96-CC-1486PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
687 So.2d 997 (1997)
Deborah FARRINGTON
v.
The LAW FIRM OF SESSIONS, FISHMAN et al.
No. 96-CC-1486.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
February 25, 1997.
Rehearing Denied March 27, 1997.
Jack Marks Alltmont, Alan David Ezkovich, Sessions & Fishman, New Orleans, for Applicant.
Elizabeth A. Alston, Maria Garcia Marks, New Orleans, for Respondent.
MARCUS, Justice[*].
Deborah Farrington filed a petition for "Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Damages and Legal Malpractice" against the law firm of Sessions, Fishman, Boisfontaine, Nathan, Winn, Butler and Barkley (the Sessions firm), four individual members of the Sessions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Ayres v. CanalesTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Esposito v. PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Presnick v. EspositoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Harrison v. Keystone Coca-Cola Bottling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Caruso v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- In re HoustonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Brooks v. South Carolina Commission on Indigent DefenseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Munsey v. Cox Communications of New Orleans, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Cloud v. BarnesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.