Brooks v. South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEATHERS, J.:
Appellant Charles Brooks challenges the circuit court’s order disqualifying Irma Brooks—Appellant’s wife and law partner—from representing him and disqualifying Appellant from representing himself pursuant to Rule 3.7 of the South Car*322olina Rules of Professional Conduct. We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellant and his wife are attorneys and practice out of Appellant’s law office. A substantial portion of Appellant’s practice has been devoted to representing indigent clients in criminal cases, post-conviction relief actions,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Teleguz v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Smithson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Cottonwood Estates, Inc. v. Paradise Builders, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fine Housing, Inc. v. SloanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
- Goss, Sr. v. KendellDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- Meyer v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Portrait Homes v. Pennsylvania National MutualCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
- Rosenthal FursCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.