Legal Opinion

Esposito v. Presnick

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 23, 1988No. 5849PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

This appeal concerns events subsequent to this court’s remand in Presnick v. Esposito, 8 Conn. App. 364, 513 A.2d 165 (1986). At the close of the plaintiffs’ case on retrial before a jury, the court granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment on that verdict. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred in (1) denying their request for leave to amend the complaint prior to trial, (2) disallowing evidence of tape recordings containing admissions by the defendant, and (3) directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of their…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BramanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. State v. BriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Sturdivant v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. In re PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. GrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Finan v. FinanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Travelers Property & Casualty Co. v. ChristieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API