State v. Hunnicutt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
Defendant initially assigns as error several evidentiary questions, the first of which concerns the introduction into evidence of a microfiche reader printout indicating that a telephone call had been made from defendant’s phone to St. Luke’s Hospital in Polk County. Defendant’s objection to the evidence as hearsay was overruled. The State asserts that the computer printout was properly admitted under the business records exception to the rule against hearsay.
The admissibility of computer printout sheets of business records stored in electronic computers is governed by our…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ConardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. OatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. OatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- People v. HolowkoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984