Legal Opinion

People v. Holowko

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 25, 1984No. 83—826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

The State has taken this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(a) (87 Ill. 2d R. 604(a)) from the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion in limine to exclude from evidence certain telephone records which the State sought to introduce at trial.

Defendant was charged by misdemeanor complaint on January 3, 1983, for the offense of harassment by telephone (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 134, par. 16.4 — 1(1)). The complaint alleged that defendant did make a phone call with conversation, at which time he made a comment which was obscene with intent to offend the complainant.

Pri…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Grand Liquor Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Brandon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. PhippsIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. WallsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HolowkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. HatfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. WiesneskeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API