Legal Opinion

Worden v. Anthony

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 12, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuktis, J.

The trial court in its memorandum setting aside the verdict, states that it so acted because in its opinion, under the evidence, the jury could not reasonably have found that the defendant was free from negligence which was a proximate cause of the decedent’s injury, and also because the jury could not reasonably have found that such negligence as the decedent was guilty of was a proximate cause of his injury; hence the verdict for the defendant could not reasonably have been rendered by the jury.

The evidential facts of the case are not seriously in controversy, but the contention between the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smithwick v. Hall & Upson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Hayden v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Guilfoile v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Montambault v. Waterbury & Milldale Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Hizam v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Smirnoff v. McNerneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Hinch v. ElliottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. England v. Watkins Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API