Hinch v. Elliott
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
As far as the decisive issue upon this appeal is concerned, the facts were little in dispute. The jury could reasonably have found them as fol lows: The plaintiff, with her husband, his brother and another woman went from the brother’s cottage, in an automobile owned by him, about ten miles to a beach to bathe. The car was a Chevrolet roadster, with a rumble seat. On the trip to the beach the women occupied the rumble seat. On the way back they sat upon the front of the car, one on each side. The plaintiff’s evidence was to the effect that they sat between the fenders of the car and the hood,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smithwick v. Hall & Upson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Guilfoile v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Montambault v. Waterbury & Milldale Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Worden v. AnthonySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Nugent v. New Haven Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Hassett v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Guarnaccia v. WiecenskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Caciopoli v. AcamporaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Hosford ex rel. Hosford v. Clark ex rel. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.