Legal Opinion

In Re Haigler

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 19, 1990No. 19-01009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILLIAM THURMOND BISHOP, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before me on the Objections to Confirmation filed by Ford Motor Credit Company (“FMCC”). FMCC filed its Objections to Confirmation on June 27, 1989, (“Objections) to the Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan dated June 1, 1989 (“Plan”). At the hearing the Court heard arguments from the attorneys for the Debtor and FMCC and from the standing Chapter 13 Trustee. The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

FMCC’s Objections concern the Plan’s failure to comply with 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B) and § 365(b). Particularly,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. S. B. McMaster, Inc. v. Chevrolet Motor Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1925
  2. Hyder v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. In Re RyeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
  4. Campbell v. Bolen (In Re Caudy Custom Builders, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
  5. Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. WaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re WinstonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
  2. In Re PellegrinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API