Legal Opinion
In Re Pellegrino
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 27, 1997No. 19-11029PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.
A INTRODUCTION
The Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan (“the Plan”) filed by MARIO PELLEGRINO and FRANCES PELLEGRINO (“the Debtors”) attempts to pay off the Debtors’ Net (Closed End) Lease Purchase Option of August 24,1994 (“the Lease”), of a 1995 Subaru Legacy station wagon (“the Car”), by paying the assignee of the Lease, Subaru American Credit (“Subaru”), the amount necessary to cure the payment delinquencies and the “Lease Residual Value” pay off due at the end of 48 months, in about the 30th month of the Lease, over the 60-month Plan period. We find that the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Alphonso Jones, Debtor, Robert M. Wood, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In Re FriesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Fogie v. Thorn Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Grant Broadcasting of Philadelphia, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re FrickerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re RothmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Shellem v. Koons (In Re Koons)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re VincenteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001