Legal Opinion

Conradi v. Arnold

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1949No. 30905PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Ida Mae Conradi, as executrix of the will of William E. Conradi, deceased, and personally, instituted this action against Grant Arnold and Elizabeth Arnold, his wife, asking for judgment for damages on each of two separate causes of action stated in the second amended complaint, hereinafter referred to as the complaint.

The first cause of action was brought under the survival statute, Rem. Rev. Stat, § 194 [P.P.C. § 3-43], as set forth in the complaint, plaintiff demanding judgment against the defendants for $10,380, on account of pain and suffering sustained by her deceased husband during his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mesher v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Peterson v. BettsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hogan v. Metropolitan Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Graham v. RoderickWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Viles v. ThunborgWashington Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cherberg v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Westland Construction Co. v. Chris Berg, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hughes v. Chehalis School District No. 302Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Feigenbaum v. BrinkWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bidlake v. Youell, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API