Legal Opinion

Graham v. Roderick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1949No. 30529PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiffs instituted suit to recover damages for personal injuries suffered and property impairment incurred as the result of an automobile collision between a car driven by one of the plaintiffs and a car driven by the defendant.

The complaint alleged that the proximate cause of the accident was the negligence of the defendant in the following particulars: (1) in traveling at an excessive rate of speed; (2) in failing to keep a proper lookout for traffic traveling ahead of him; (3) in following too closely behind the plaintiffs’ machine; (4) in failing to keep his automobile under reasonable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. McAllister v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Paddock v. ToneWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Peterson v. MayhamWashington Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Adkisson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Groves v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Mathis v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Shockey v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. Day v. FrazerWashington Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API