Legal Opinion

Viles v. Thunborg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1931No. 23115. Department TwoPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff Myrtle C. Viles.- The cause was tried to the court and jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $2,500. The court, however, entered judgment for the defendant notwithstanding the verdict, on the theory that Mrs. Viles was contributorily negligent as a matter of law, barring her the right of recovery. From this judgment, the plaintiffs have appealed.

The facts essential to be stated are these: The respondent operates a hotel at Spokane, Washington. At about ten or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Main v. LehmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. Ware v. Evangelical Baptist Benevolent & Missionary SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Brugher v. . BuchtenkirchNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Hertz v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Weller v. . Consolidated Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Walsh v. West Coast Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Caron v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Wessner v. Blue Ridge Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Hayden v. Colville Valley National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Cornwell v. S. S. Kresge Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API