Legal Opinion

Feigenbaum v. Brink

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1965No. 36688PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

November 1, 1960, Bennett Feigenbaum and Roberta, his wife, leased a beach house on Bainbridge Island from William Brink and Barbara, his wife. The sole means of access to the leased premises was a walkway leading from the public road, cut into the hillside above, downhill past the Brink residence to the beach house. The portion of the walkway with which we are here concerned was constructed of roughhewn wooden planks, with a strip of abrasive paint down the center line. The planks were laid crosswise, sloping downward at about a 15 degree angle, interspersed with some irregularly spaced…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. ArguelloWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McGrath v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Walsh v. West Coast Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Siragusa v. Swedish HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Rocky Mountain Trucking Co. v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Cherberg v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lyons v. Redding Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Barrett v. FritzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API