Legal Opinion

G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 6, 1990No. Court No. 84-12-01779Published

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Chief Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duties purposes, of certain merchandise described on the customs invoices as “ceramic steins.” The merchandise was imported from Brazil, and entered at the port of Baltimore, Maryland.

The merchandise was classified by the Customs Service as “[m]ugs and other steins,” under item 533.30 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), with duty assessed at the rate of 13.5 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff protests this classification and contends that the *615merchandise is properly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Carborundum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API