Legal Opinion
State v. Moe
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1998No. Criminal 970290, 970291PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] David Moe appeals from judgments of conviction entered upon conditional pleas of guilty, asserting his rights to a speedy disposition of detainers and to a speedy trial were violated. We affirm.
I. FACTS
[¶ 2] In 1993, Moe was charged in Burleigh County, North Dakota, with theft of property, possession of controlled substances, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Moe failed to appear at the hearing on those charges, and was subsequently charged with failure to appear. Moe was later incarcerated in Colorado on other charges, and in March 1996 North Dakota filed a detainer…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. David Henson, A/K/A Paul v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- State v. TosteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Richard W. Norton v. Al C. ParkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- State v. MurchisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. BurkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. AgueroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HinojosaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. LafromboiseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.