Legal Opinion
Sieverding v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 12, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1032PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Kay and David Sieverding, proceeding pro se, have sued the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ” or “Department”) alleging violations of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a et seq., as well as a number of other claims. Currently before the Court is the Department’s motion to dismiss the Sieverdings’ amended complaint in part or in the alternative for partial summary judgment. 1 Also pending are the Sieverdings’ motion for partial summary judgment and an array of miscellaneous motions. For the reasons detailed below, the Court will grant the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boling v. U.S. Parole Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Alford v. Providence HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Sieverding v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Boling v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Eustice v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.