Legal Opinion

Sieverding v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1032PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Kay and David Sieverding, proceeding pro se, have sued the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ” or “Department”) alleging violations of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a et seq., and several other claims. In March 2012, the Court granted partial summary judgment to DOJ on the entirety of the Sieverdings’ Privacy Act claims, and denied their cross-motion for partial summary judgment and array of miscellaneous claims. See Sieverding v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 847 F.Supp.2d 75, 88 (D.D.C.2012). Currently before the Court are numerous motions…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Cunningham v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Pinson v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Ellis v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. Washburn v. Court Ordered Benefits SectionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API