Legal Opinion
In Re Discipline of Raymond G. O'Malley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 1948No. 34,297PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a proceeding for the disbarment of respondent as an attorney at law. The case comes before us upon the referee’s report and findings, which are unchallenged. Respondent moves to dismiss upon the ground that at the time of the commencement of this proceeding there were pending against him civil actions by his former clients to recover the amounts which the referee found he had misappropriated.
The pendency of another action is no ground for dismissal of the second action, but it is in some cases a ground for a stay of proceedings therein. Richardson v. Merritt, 74 Minn. 354, 77 N. W.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richardson v. MerrittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- In Re Disbarment of Samuel L. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- In Re Disbarment of John W. CloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Southworth v. BearnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Head v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In Re the Discipline of PrimusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Application for Discipline of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.