Legal Opinion

In Re Discipline of King

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1950No. 35,462PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent, Stephen Michael King, is an attorney at law of this state. November 9, 1950, the Practice of Law Committee of the Minnesota State Bar Association filed a petition and accusation in this court charging respondent with misconduct on nine separate counts and praying that he be disbarred or otherwise disciplined. The petition and accusation were served upon the respondent November 17, 1950. At the same time respondent was served with an order of this court directing him to plead or file his answer to the accusation and petition in the office of the clerk of this court within 20…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Disbarment of Elmer C. TurnquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. In Re Disbarment of Arthur E. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Application for Discipline of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. In Re Application for Discipline of Benjamin Peter ConstantineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. In re Discipline of BoozierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API