Legal Opinion

In re Discipline of Timm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1954No. 36,401PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Practice of Law Committee of the Minnesota State Bar Association has commenced this proceeding against Frank H. Timm, an attorney at law in this state, and has requested that Timm be disbarred or otherwise disciplined.

The petition and accusation, together with an order of this court directing Timm to answer within eight days after service of the order, were personally served upon Timm on April 29, 1954. Timm has failed to answer and proof of such default has been filed. Therefore, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XXI (222 Minn, xxxix), an order of discipline will be entered upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Disbarment of I. A. ChmelikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. In Re Disbarment of A. M. BredingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. In Re Application for Discipline of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. In Re Disbarment of ComfortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. In Re Disbarment of Paul S. ReddingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Application for Discipline of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API