Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Breeden
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided July 20, 1999No. COA98-422PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Defendants appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for partial summary judgment predicated upon governmental immunity. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Pertinent facts and procedural history include the following: On 15 January 1992, Michael Anthony Schmidt (Michael) was a six year old student enrolled in a voluntary after-school enrichment program operated and controlled by defendant Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (the Board) at the Idlewild Elementary School (hereinafter the Program). The Program was not included within the regular school curriculum, but…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Moore v. City of CreedmoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Britt v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Block v. County of PersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Evans v. Housing Auth. of City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Schlossberg v. GoinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Boyd v. Robeson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.