Legal Opinion
Moore v. City of Creedmoor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 10, 1997No. 435A95PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Justice.
This case involves a civil action which was filed seeking damages for malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of federal and state constitutional rights. Plaintiffs James Moore and Gracye Moore instituted this action in response to a nuisance abatement action which had been filed against them pertaining to the operation of their dinette. The nuisance abatement action was filed by the District Attorney for the Ninth Judicial District after the Board of Commissioners of the City of Creedmoor passed a resolution declaring that Moore’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- David Evans v. Patrick BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Mullis v. SechrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Glenn-Robinson v. AckerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Boyd v. Robeson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.