Legal Opinion

Schlossberg v. Goins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 2000No. COA99-1391PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Unless waived or consented to, a city and its employees acting in their official capacities are protected from tort actions under the doctrine of governmental immunity. Likewise, public officers’ immunity protects public officials from actions for mere negligence in the performance of their duties. The trial court in this case denied the City of Greensboro and its police officers the benefit of both doctrines. We reverse that judgment insofar as its holding is based on governmental immunity, but affirm the trial court’s decision to deny summary judgment on the basis of the public…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Taylor v. AshburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Hare v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Slade v. VernonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Pettiford v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
  3. Campbell v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Hart v. BrienzaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Prior v. PruettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API