Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1996No. CR-95-0555-PRPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

In this narcotics case, the trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress because it found an investigatory stop violated the Fourth Amendment. Two police officers had stopped defendant because he emerged at night from behind some large bushes in a darkened residential area, walked down the middle of the road, and stared at two other police officers as they conducted a traffic stop. The court of appeals reversed in a memorandum decision. We granted defendant’s petition for review and have jurisdiction pursuant to article VI, section 5(3) of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzalez-GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BrockmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. WymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. State v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API