Legal Opinion
State v. Livingston
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 16, 2003No. 2 CA-CR 2003-0027PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, J.
¶ 1 The trial court granted appellee Mary Livingston’s motion to suppress the evidence seized from her car after she was stopped for a possible traffic violation. The state appeals that ruling, claiming the officer possessed constitutionally permissible grounds for stopping Livingston. We affirm.
¶ 2 Livingston was charged with transportation of marijuana for sale, a class two felony, personal possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, and use of marijuana, all class six felonies. Livingston filed a motion to suppress evidence and argued, inter alia, that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando Lopez-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Linzey Danielle SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. AbelnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- State v. WolferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MohajerinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.