Legal Opinion

Hadfield v. State Ex Rel. Burns

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1963No. 9297PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*564KNUDSON, Chief Justice.

Appellant, as plaintiff, commenced this action to recover temporary and permanent damages to his real property which abuts upon and has a frontage of approximately 150 feet on, Gould Street, in Pocatello, Idaho, upon which property he operates a service station. It is alleged in appellant’s complaint, that on May 10, 1962, defendant-respondent commenced reconstruction of Gould Street for the purpose of making it a 4-lane divided highway; that during the course of construction of such highway said street was excavated 3 feet below its former level and the level of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. AyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State Highway Commission v. PetersWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bare v. Department of HighwaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API