Flickinger v. Fay
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. John Reynolds, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The mayor and common council of the city of San Jose passed a resolution August 26, 1895, of their intention to order certain improvement of Santa Clara street between Third and Eleventh streets, in said city, and this resolution having been posted and published as required by law, subsequently passed a resolution ordering the work to be done. Under proceedings regularly taken therefor, a contract for doing the work was afterward entered into on behalf of the city with. *591the respondent. After the respondent had commenced work under this contract, the plaintiffs, who are owners of property…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- The Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. JurgensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Pitser v. City of PawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Bush v. City of DentonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926