Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Royal-Pioneer Paper Box Mfg. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 23, 1961No. Civ. A. 30097PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
By agreement of counsel, this case came before the court on August 22, 1961, on final hearing. A detailed Memorandum of Law Brief (Document No. 5) and Requests for Findings of Fact (Document No. 6) and Conclusions of Law (Document No. 7) have been filed by plaintiff and the testimony has been transcribed. Counsel informed the trial judge that, in addition to the provision for liquidation of part of defendant’s inventory contained in Conclusion of Law 11(b), plaintiff had agreed to purchase from defendant certain other items of inventory.
The trial judge adopts the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- The Upjohn Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. David Schwartz, Doing Business as Bryant Pharmaceutical Company, Defendant-Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Goebel Brewing Co. v. Esslingers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Federal-Mogul-Bower Bearings, Inc. v. AzoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Geisel v. Poynter Products Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Thorn, Philip A. v. Reliance Van Company, Inc., Welsh, Thomas, Weatherley, Charles A., Bailey, Emma M., and O'neal, N.A. Michael, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Franklin Mint, Inc. v. Franklin Mint, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Mr. Gasket Co. v. TravisOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.