Legal Opinion
Federal-Mogul-Bower Bearings, Inc. v. Azoff
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1963No. 14920PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant seeks review of an order dismissing its complaint on the ground that it did not state a cause of action. It is the contention of appellant that it alleged in its complaint sufficient facts to maintain its claim against appellees, for false description and representation, under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1125(a).
The above section of the Lanham Act provides:
“False designations of origin and false descriptions forbidden. Any person who shall affix, apply, or annex, or use in connection with any goods or services, or any container or containers for goods, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Samson Crane Co. v. Union Nat. Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
- Scarves by Vera, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- American Rolex Watch Corp. v. Jack Laufer & Jan Voort, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1959
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Royal-Pioneer Paper Box Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Boston Professional Hockey Association, Inc. v. Dallas Cap & Emblem Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Chevron Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc., a Texas Corporation, and Hi-Yield Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.