Mr. Gasket Co. v. Travis
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
This appeal is directed only at errors claimed to affect the corporate defendant, Speed Industries, Inc., except for Assignments of Error Nos. 7 and 8. Those two assignments challenge the award of attorney’s fees, litigation expenses, and costs which was made jointly and severally against defendants Speed Industries, Inc., Gilbert Edward Travis, and Charles Klick (see paragraph 2, Journal Entry of February 10, 1972, by the trial court) and a claim that an element of proof necessary for the award of attorney’s fees, properly the plaintiff’s burden, was placed on the defendants.
Plaintiff-appelle…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Rogers Imports, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Ferrari S.P.A. Esercizio Fabriche Automobili E Corse v. Carl Roberts, D/B/A Roberts Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- Worthington Foods, Inc. v. Kellogg Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- Cesare v. WorkOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.