Legal Opinion

Hohener v. Gauss

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1963No. Civ. 21201PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

Appellant, Hohener, gave an assignable option to purchase land which was assigned to respondent, Gauss. The option required payment of $1,200 on or before each six-month period. On April 20, 1961 and October 20, 1961, payments were due. On April 8, 1961, a $1,200 check sent by Gauss was received by Hohener. He simply held the check. On October 3, 1961, a second $1,200 check was received. Both were drawn on the San Lorenzo Branch of First Western Bank. Hohener’s lawyer attempted to have the two cheeks certified, first at United California Bank on November 2, 1961, and later, on December 14,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Enfield v. Huffman Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. CidcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Riverside Fence Co. v. NovakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Layton v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Noyes v. Habitation Resources, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Sheldon Builders, Inc. v. Trojan TowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API