Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dixson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1988No. OSB 84-88; 84-110; 84-111; 85-81; and 85-107 SC 28109PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding, the Trial Panel of the Disciplinary Board of the Oregon State Bar found the accused guilty of disciplinary rule violations in each of the Bar’s ten causes of complaint. Based upon its findings and conclusions, the Trial Panel recommended suspending the accused from the practice of law for six months, with execution of the entire period of suspension stayed, and placing the accused on probation with conditions 1 for a period of two years. This matter is now before this court for de novo review pursuant to ORS 9.536(2) and BR 10.4(a).

The Bar requested that this…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API