Legal Opinion
State v. NOCEO
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 15, 2009No. 2 CA-CR 2008-0315, 2 CA-SA 2009-0020PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In the summer of 2007, appellee Edward Noceo and petitioner Michael Harris were separately arrested and charged with driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI). Both had samples of their blood drawn by law enforcement officers at the scene of their arrests, and both subsequently moved to prevent admission of the blood test results at trial, asserting that the procedures used to draw their blood were unconstitutional.
¶ 2 Noceo’s motion was granted, and the state appeals from the superior court’s order precluding the introduction of blood-alcohol evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ove v. GwinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. OlcavageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- People v. EsayianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. CampoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. JohnstonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Siddiq v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Harris v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Nocero v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.