United States v. Max Littwitz, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGRaiiam, Presiding Judge
The appellee imported at the port of New York certain merchandise, hereinafter more particularly described, which was classified by the collector at 90 per centum ad valorem under the first duty provision of paragraph 1430 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The appellee protested, making various claims in his protest, but upon appeal has abandoned all of these claims except the claim made under paragraph 921 of said act, providing for manufactures of cotton. The relevant provisions of the respective paragraphs are as follows:
Par. 1430. Laces, lace window curtains, burnt-out laces, and embroideries…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.