Legal Opinion

Nassan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1942No. 4897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by Harry J. Nassan, alias Henry Renfro, from a conviction and sentence on five of seven counts of an indictment, charging violation by him and six others of the Mail Fraud Statute, Section 215 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 338. Appellant was also convicted on the eighth count of the same indictment, charging a conspiracy to violate the Mail Fraud Statute, in contravention of Title 18, § 88, U.S.C.A. The only issue presented on this appeal is the legal sufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict by the jury of appellant’s guilt. The use of the mails was admitted.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. New South Farm & Home Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. O'Hara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  3. Aiken v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  4. United States v. SpielbergerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  2. Hawley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  3. United States v. Arnold E. VanderseeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. Liuksila v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Liuksila v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API