Legal Opinion

Aiken v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1939No. 4498PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, District Judge.

Defendant (appellant) was convicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of South Carolina for using the mails to defraud. 18 U.S.C.A. § 338. The indictment was in seven counts. The first and seventh counts, charging offenses under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. § 77 (q), were quashed by the trial judge; so defendant was tried and convicted under the Mail Fraud Statute on counts two to six, inclusive.

As a ground for reversal, defendant insists that the indictment ,is uncertain, indefinite and duplicitous. The chief basis for this attack…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Asgill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Battjes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,511 United States of America v. Carl J. Simon, Robert H. Kaiser and Melvin S. FishmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. McCraryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  4. Jerome D. Linden, Robert R. Baylis, Classified Business Directory, Inc., and Directory Listings, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  5. United States v. AMREP Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API