United States v. New South Farm & Home Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.. The facts, which. involVe the construction and application of § 215 of the Federal Criminal Code, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
This writ of error is directed to a decision of the District Court sustaining a demurrer to an indictment and is prosecuted under the Criminal Appeals Act, it being contended by the Government that the decision involved the construction of § 215 of the Criminal Code. The opposing contention is that the court passed only on the sufficiency of the indictment as a criminal pleading and that, therefore, the writ of error should be dismissed. The contentions are repeated here, and make the issue. They necessarily require a consideration of the indictment. It is constituted of three counts. Their…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. BarnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. PortaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Regent Office Supply Co., Inc., and Oxford Office Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. PearlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Lewis F. Shelton, James Darrough, John Derry, Donald Burks, and Carl BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. David F. Brown, Tore T. Debella, Richard A. Reizen, Robert F. EhrlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. MandelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.