MacMullan v. Kelly
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
In this proceeding the petitioner sought by mandamus to compel the respondent, in his official capacity as treasurer of the county of Alameda, to pay to the petitioner upon assigned claims several amounts of money totaling the sum of $42.09, which it was alleged had been by petitioner’s assignors paid to the then assessor of Alameda county as taxes on unsecured personal property for the fiscal year 1902-3. The petition alleges that the several sums sued for and paid as taxes for that year were collected by the assessor in accordance with the provisions of chapter 8 of the Political Code, upon…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Baker v. JosephCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Anderson v. NorthropSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hayman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- England v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Blackford v. City of LibbyMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.