Legal Opinion

England v. Winslow

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 10803PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by the plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court in favor of the defendant after entry of an order sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the amended complaint. The facts upon which the plaintiff’s alleged right of action is founded as set forth in said amended complaint are briefly these: Sophia R. Winslow died testate on May 1, 1919. In her last will and testament Harry D. Skellinger and Mary D. England were named as executor and executrix respectively thereof. Said Skellinger failed to apply for letters testamentary but Mary D. England did so apply,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Odell v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. The People v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Butler v. HylandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Zundel v. ZundelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Simmons v. FridaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Airola v. GorhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. In Re Trust Under Will of KoffendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API