Ruffin v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DE ME NT, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation’s (“NMAC”) motion for summary judgment filed April 30, 1996. The plaintiff failed to respond m opposition. After careful consideration of the relevant case law and the record as a whole, the court finds that the defendant’s motion is due to be granted.
JURISDICTION
This court has subject-matter jurisdiction under the diversity jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as there exists complete diversity between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000. Personal jurisdiction…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Michael A. Barfield v. David Brierton, Louis Carmichael, Richard Dugger, Thomas Barton, David E. Watson, Jerry C. Wade, Randall R. Music, John ShawCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.