Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1993No. 1921029PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Justice.

William T. Williamson and Flora V. Williamson appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (“Nissan”) and Scott Campbell on their claim alleging misrepresentation, conversion, and wrongful repossession.

On February 1, 1989, Mr. Williamson purchased a new 1989 Nissan automobile and financed it through Nissan. The “Retail Installment Contract” created a security interest in Nissan, with a right to repossess the ear upon default, without notice to the debt- or. The agreement also contained both a nonmodification clause, which required that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Lowe v. East End Memorial Hosp. and Health CentersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Coggin v. Starke Bros. Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Hale v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. McAllister v. Langford Investigators, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Ruffin v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API