Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 3, 1925No. 15130PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
Defendant assigns five specifications of error in its petition in error, but all are comprehended by and argued under one proposition in the brief. That proposition reads:
‘‘The plaintiff wholly failed to establish any contractual relation with the city of Tulsa in connection with the items sued for, and its evidence wholly failed to establish, a prima facie case or sufficient grounds for recovery against a municipal corporation.”
Two contentions are made under this proposition, as follows: (a) That no contract between plaintiff and defendant was shown, and therefore no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shawnee Light & Power Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Buxton Skinner Stationery v. Bd. of Com'rs of CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Dane v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Farmers' State Bank of Jefferson v. JordonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Langley v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Johnston v. DillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Nottingham v. City of YukonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Nottingham v. City of YukonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988