Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nottingham v. City of Yukon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1988No. 66245Published

1Dissent

KAUGER, Justice,

with whom DOOLIN, Chief Justice joins dissenting.

There are three kinds of authority under which a city manager may settle and compromise an employee’s claim for wrongful demotion — express, implied and apparent authority. Because the city was estopped to deny the appearance of authority with which it cloaked the city manager to settle and compromise the employee’s claim, a more detailed discussion of the facts is necessitated.

Charles Nottingham, (employee/appellee) was employed by the City of Yukon as a captain in the fire department. In March, 1981, he was demoted from the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Mayor of Balto. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  5. Ambrozich v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API