Legal Opinion

Langley v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1927No. 17625PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFER, C.

This is an action brought against the defendant and 51 others for the foreclosure of alleged tax liens on 27 separate tracts or lots of land in Osage county.- The action is brought under the provisions of chapter .12, Session Laws 1925. The petition in part is as follows:

“Comes now the above-named plaintiff, and for 16 causes of action against each of the defendants named in the caption hereof, states:
“That said plaintiff is the owner and holder (through due and legal assignments, purchases and deliveries) of the hereafter described tax certificates, executed and issued on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Craft Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. Quinnipiac Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Cook v. SearchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Rehkamp v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Citizens Insurance v. EtchenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tsibikas v. MorrofNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. Commonwealth Co. v. LowenhauptSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Momand v. Paramount Publix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  4. Larcade v. CulbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Casner v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API