Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 4, 1926No. 16178PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., 'by defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, wherein plaintiff sought to recover ■the sum of $1,071.65, with interest, for gas which was alleged to have been furnished to the defendant, city of Tulsa, for its municipal building, from January 31, 1921, to October 30, 1922, which amounted to $1,204.-25, upon which it is alleged there had been a payment of $132.60, leaving a balance due of the amount sued for.

Defendant filed its amended answer, generally denying each…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Freeland v. Heron, Lenox & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Hoffman v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. United States Rubber Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Lamont Mercantile Co. v. PiburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Galbreath v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API